The third step in the model for a good environmental analysis. How do you do that? Here too we have four suggestions for you: Pattern What kind of patterns do you see when you look at all the data through your eyelashes? Which reaction or Russia WhatsApp Number List sentiment is more common than others? What things can you connect with each other? Highlights Sometimes one message or reaction can be more valuable or riskier for your organization than a hundred of the same messages or reactions. You should therefore certainly not ignore this in your environmental analysis. Source influence One source is not the other.
It makes a difference whether your organization is discussed by a twitterer with 100 or 100,000 followers. Therefore, you should also thoroughly understand the influence that a certain source has on the stakeholders that are relevant to you. Validation To what extent can you rely on data from external sources? Is the interpretation that a newspaper gives of a residents’ meeting correct? Validate this data by checking with colleagues or stakeholders who attended the meeting. As an environmental analyst, you can fully demonstrate your added value and make a difference when making nuances.
Here you determine which data you will include in your environmental analysis and which you do not consider necessary at that time. That always brings with it the necessary dilemmas, but remember that you are the specialist in this field. And if in doubt, look for coordination with your colleagues. Especially if you work together in a newsroom, the lines are usually short. 4. Giving meaning You have collected your data and added the necessary nuances. Until now, environmental analysis is mainly something you do as an environmental analyst.